Dumping information redpills. Hopefully someone can make good use of it in the future. It doesn't matter if some of the older physicians were wrong in their hypotheses. Crude as medicine was then, they are better than what is offered by the "dude sex/masturbation is an unlimited entertainment system!" addicts have to say. At least these doctors through the ages are appealing to physiology and have excellent reasoning behind their motives.
>>5419738It will lead to habituation and reactivate the pathways created by pornography. You need to stop if you want to undo the damage. Abstinence is ideal.
>>5419740Western Medicine, Science and society at large, in all but the last 60 years, held the exact opposite belief; we live in an absurdistan today. It's only recently where people dismiss it as "honestly autistic bro science".
To answer your question: ALL sexual excesses are harmful.
Marriage/mongamy has the unique effect of decreasing in frequency (see graph). We pervert it with "fetishes" to fool the body into thinking it's copulating with multiple partners. However, the frequency of sexual activity confined to a marriage, naturally decreases.
Sex without procreation is a pointless activity, a waste of time, something that spreads disease and is no different than a physical pornography session. Nobody in this entire thread is saying to replace the hand with some degenerate slut. You've drank the sexual revolution Kool-Aid kid.
