>>17022197>Bible is not a history book.It is objectively a history book. Many parts have been independently verified. The Bible spoke of Pilate before any archeological evidence was known etc.
>Bible is not a word of Jesus either It has many many direct quotes from him written down by several people. We know they were different people.
>at best it is written by some jews who walked around and recorded stuff At best? That is exactly how history is recorded. Do you have some other idea regarding how history is recorded?
One of the Gospel writers, Luke, was not jewish. He was a gentile. Following jesus wasn't a jews only club.
>And then Bible was overwritten many times.A complete and utter trivial lie.
You can get the oldest manuscripts and compare them if you want.