>>10116798I have a very shallow opinion of most posters, obviously memeflags mr JIDF; but even more so, of those who refuse to call a fish a fish. Your depth and breath of knowledge of what the space program is devoid of facts that you've never even considered - pic case in point which was the beginning of the facade.
When the 'Apollo landings' are proven in a way that is:
>1. Independent>2. Verifiable>3. RepeatableThen it will be believed scientifically. Until then it meets only the far lower historical bar for evidence - the same kind of bar they falsely convict people accused of fake crimes. The Apollo fraud is precisely that, a fraud. It exists only as a 'good' inspiring piece of fiction which help create jobs and industry at considerable expense no less.
Good day sir.
