>>20227272>Yes very true but why should currency have intrinsic value?Technically they don't need to, but it require two thing : trust and a good management.
Trust of course is vital, among the users first because you need to be sure everybody will accept this new medium of exchange. Nowaday it's relatively easy because the governments have the way to enforce it (via taxation for example), and people simply forgot alternatives existed.
But you also need to trust the ability of the people in charge of your monetary policy they are going to do a good job.
And that's always here currencies are eventually failing.
It's even more blatant ever since the jewish mafia took control over our currencies. Currencies became a tool of oppression and control, and is only used to further the talmudic agenda while vampirizing people's work force.
If it wasn't for the fact we standardized everything and we are so used to said currencies (and a bit of cowardice too, let be honest), and any emerging alternatives will be met with full force of the ZOG, people would already have abandoned something so shitty it's losing 1/10th of it's value every fucking year.
So having intrinsic value in your money is a testament of good leaders admitting :
>we do not have the willpower of not abusing this extreme tool of power, we wont ask you to trust us for this very reason, instead trust what you have in handAnd honestly, giving away to humans (kikes in this instance) this kind of power is just too much of a responsibility. This duty should be collective, at all time, and that's what PMs do : everybody is a part of the equation.