>>10136367I didnt even look at the arms of the clock
clearly 25 is the answer the guys who make it were looking for, they tried to copy the one with the wisthles and the boy, but they fucked up the exercise
>>10136370you re the moron here, everything in this problem and in other problems like it associate a value with an object, this one says that the same object in a different state can have different values, you cant throw in a rule like this without saying its a rule, right now we dont know if a clock is always worth 6 or if its worth whatever the arms are pointing to, because we literally have no information to tell us that, which is why the problem itself is wrong
if there was a clock anywhere else that HAD a different value with different arm position we would know, but the only one appears in the one we have to solve, so we literally DONT have the information required to solve it
we have to resort to psychology, and this isnt math
>>10136369>I never said it wasn't. Just that my understanding of how the game presented them(no moving portals aside) a cube halfway through +1 wouldn't fly the rest of the way through if the portal travel was stopped, or reversed, it would just continue to sit on the platform.it wouldnt, see my post, it would basically shred the cube/pole layer by layer with forces stronger than what is possible in reality, its good to think of newtonian physics when looking at the object but dont forget material science is still a thing and physics applies to molecules too
>>10136377>2. The pole/cube IS moving relative to the blue portal.yes
and the reference frame of the orange portal is the same as the blue portal
do you understand how you are a moron yet?
>Yet it does not shoot out the other portal because it doesn't have inertia, therefore, no velocity.it literally HAS both inercia and velocity in the reference frame of the blue portal
you literally just fucking said it
