>>17950178>And what is wrong with not having free willNothing. God chose to give us free will though
>What do you call will that can only choose between good and good then? That makes no sense. You are using the word "choose" completely wrong. There is no choice if the option is A or A. There is only choice if the options are A or B. You are just making up something to be contrarian.
But to answer your question in light of correcting your error: if the only options are A or A then you are describing "God's will"...
>inb4 God knows future choices so the only option is A so we dunna have free willFatalism is not a proven argument and I will not bother trying to convince you otherwise if you disagree because it means you've been arguing in bad faith this whole thread.
>You're still free to chooseNonsense. There is no choice in your scenario.
>the only difference are the options>pluralYou just admitted there is one option: "good" because there is no option of "bad" in your scenario of "choosing" good or good.
You have defeated yourself.
>Why wouldn't you want that? I don't want to be a mindless NPC, obviously.
>No worries, peace, bliss, what's wrong with that?Nothing is wrong with that, but God chose to give us free will.
