>>11517421it's just wild that this is my first experience with it i suppose. earlier i used the example that i had an english professor push feminism but that was at least through literary analysis of a book by a notable feminist author same as every other assignment in the class which is perfectly reasonable. this is just so unbelievably obvious that they could not care about the educational value of these assignments at all beyond pushing eco consciousness and seemingly the idea of cucking companies. in what world is that acceptable in government funded academia?
worst she could do is find an excuse to fail me for her course but that would mean i'm out another $300 from having to retake it next semester. if i were confident in my chemistry abilities it wouldn't matter but considering i haven't answered a single test question without asking google or gary and i'm still at a middle B (as of last time she updated grades a month ago) it's probably not best to tempt the bull in that regard.
there is a discussion topic open for asking questions about "general chemistry concepts" and i considered asking what the fuck the last few discussions have to do with the class material. of course i'd pretend to be genuinely concerned that i'm failing to relate chemistry concepts.
ultimately though there are optional "class surveys" at the end of every semester that let you give anonymous feedback about your experience with the class so i'll probably use the open ended section to write a scathing review. as i understand it these reviews are unironically srs bsns and professors can get in big trouble from bad ones
>>11517428idfk u'd know better than i would. not leaps and bounds in nuc tech?
>>11517432right on time
>>11517442very sad to see
https://youtu.be/e5igMSvYTdwgoodnight
