>>12570070maybe you're on to something
>>12570085well not exactly, but sorta
i'll try. my problem is that i keep working very zoomed in on small parts but those are gonna be tiny in the real thing so i can't gauge how much detail will be needed
>>12570087cause they're pretty by default? that's why i only end up commenting on stuff that can be different between pics
>>12570154t-thanks
how is he only 24, hasn't he been around for a very long time? not that i ever watched him