>>13605156>the moon has this huge and extremely bright thing in the sky above the surface in which there is no atmosphere to diffuse the light>it's called the sun>but I will ignore that because I think it is impossible for the world's wealthiest nation with the world's most brilliant scientists and engineers to land men on the moonLet me get this straight... One imbecile says something buffonnish, and we choose to believe the one imbecile over the tens of thousands of scientists, engineers, and astronauts who were either directly involved or who have used the data and the equipment left on the moon to conduct verifiable studies.
Retroreflectors. How did they get on the moon? How is it that they happen to be installed in the very location that Apollo 11 had landed? How is it that agencies, equipment manufacturers and universities have used the retroreflectors on the moon to test equipment on the earth?
>hurr, they really aren't there, thoughLunar rover tracks. Apollo 15, 16, and 17 logged over 55 miles of travel on the moon with the lunar rover. The moon is covered in inches of dust. There are FIFTY FIVE MILES OF LUNAR TRACKS ON THE MOON. There is no erosion on the moon. Those tracks are going to be there forever unless disturbed by a meteor. Someday, some country's astronauts other than the US will land on the moon and travel around. They will most assuredly orbit the moon. They will undoubtedly pass over the Apollo mission landing sites.
So, these conspiracy tards think the US lied about the whole thing. There are no lunar rover tracks on the moon. And China lands there. China blows the whistle that there are no Apollo lunar rover tracks anywhere to be found on the moon. Takes pictures and video of the supposed Apollo landing sites and proves it. Do you really think the US would have lied and taken such a chance to destroy US credibility in the world? If your answer is yes, then you are a child-mentality who doesn't have a clue how the world works.