>>11569799System theory and complexity is perhaps the most useful language to map our understanding of what problems we identify, the solutions most probable to address those problems, and how to implements those solutions through action. It is the sociology most disregarded by your critics. Many graduates in this field have never even herd of Luhman or Bateson and this is no accident imo. To succeed in any way of managing our circumstance will require a little effort and innovation.
To put it clear, the managerial structure of our institutions are placing top-down constraints upon our abilities to organize politically for whatever reason. Any expert would understand that an adaptive system with the will to survive will deliberate around those constraints and select representation to manage that innovation. This is only possible if we are capable of the creative process necessary to perceive the choices necessary to overcome complications restraining innovation.
Color identity is one of those restraints because identity is a fundamental necessity to the deliberate management of adaptive process in coordination with any political representation with special skills. If color identity is nonviable, it must be discarded for what is. We have nations and we should not just default to the complications imposed by our critics that nations are not real, or that anyone can be the nation. Do what your leaders tell you. Take back your nation
