>>20977824>BLM=anti-slavery protestsBLM was about being anti-white and you know that you sleezy chink. they vandalized statues of saint louis purely on the basis that he invaded africa, in the 1300s, in the middle of the crusades, when africa routinely invaded europe. so the message there is that blacks can invade europe, but whites cant invade africa, even to counterattack or defend themselves. why would you support that just to make some gay point about 'anti-christians'? why would you defend such a purely demonic movement?