>>16169619The assertion that a highly evolved descendant of humans is the energetic and intelligent creative source of what goes on to create the universe is not a claim that can be dismissed with the burden-of-proof fallacy.
The burden of proof is on you to disprove it, and your failure to provide a theory, hypothesis or proof with fewer moving parts that's predicts everything just as well, places the burden of proof on you to defeat this model with something, anything that's better.
Your explanation of: "Nobody knows the answer" is not a candidate explanation that fits the criteria that earns entry into the tournament of leading theories as to the nature of the universe and life in it. Which appears to be sprouting its own universes at a geometrically exponential rate of return. To be impeded by some resource exhaustion limit beyond our field of view.
