>>20249421Men are parasitic to the genome. They can't have kids themselves so they depend on women to choose them. Women can have children all by themselves with biotech (using two eggs) but they choose not to build their own societies, they're content with sitting on their asses and sucking off resources from men.
Women are parasitic to civilization. They don't work in hard physical jobs, they don't build houses or electric grids or plumbing or anything really, it's all bullshit jobs with them. They make fewer money and take much more from the government than they give, and they vote for these policies as well. They collectively bring civilization and progress down because they're indispensable, as they're the only ones who can get pregnant.
Civilization is in decline because of this inefficiency, as women stop having children when they become liberated.
So who do you think is gonna win? Will women bring civilization down, and we'll return to tribal primitive societies, or will civilization find a way to eliminate the bottleneck and transcend (artificial wombs)?
I think it's pretty obvious. The geo-trauma called capitalism isn't just gonna sit around and be eliminated by some meatbags, it has super-intelligent machines and dyson spheres and space colonies to build. It's already happening. Hyper-capitalism is inevitable, and women need not apply.
