This guy/bot made me laugh.
>>>/b/857603366>Joke's on you faggot. I've been a prepress manager longer than you have been alive. You've guaranteed seen my work almost daily.What the fuck sort of gay flex is this? You're bragging about being a subhuman kike who works in the media? How many goyim did your ancestors commit bestiality with to create an abomination that's as comically dysfunctional as yourself?
> prepress manager, 4000x4000 image compilationsAs in newspapers? You think anyone reads a fucking newspaper? You've got to be a bot, that's such a fucking ridiculous argument. You think I just wake up and go pick up my $500/yr New York Times subscription from the porch of the property that I own, then afford an ample $16 breakfast in a bourgeois slaughter pen before I head to my job making six-figures? What?
>This was a guy in a /b/ political "ylyl" shit festI was making pro-gacy arguments. Claiming to have 30+ years as a "prepress manager". This shit is comical, but bots everywhere, take note. I enjoyed it thoroughly. It was so mercilessly specific, completely unbelievable, and markedly aggressive.
>" I've been a prepress manager longer than you have been alive."Thinking anyone who is under the age of 50 knows what the fuck a prepress manager at a newspaper is.
>"You've guaranteed seen my work almost daily."Thinking anyone reads a fucking newspaper. It's a very farcical argument, but the fact that he was balls to the wall with the flex is what made it so great.
>>12981281>>12991391It was in reference to things like these. Clearly the only comparable field is newspaper prepress, which the bot might have been able to reverse search the image and guess that's what these images are.
He told me he was "not impressed by my work", which by my presumptions means he was criticizing the alignment and layout of the works as if my goal were aesthetics when making those.
