>>11110416Yes, but it depends on how it's used. I met a Baptist preacher in prison who said evolution wasn't true, and they will not listen to explanations. If a tall 6'3" woman reproduced with a 5'7" manlet, the child will most likely be taller than the father. That is evolution. If a white women reproduces with a black man, that child will inherit features from each, yet this is dysgenics as the offspring will have intelligence in between the mother's and the father's. The offspring has a higher chance of being a petty criminal.
The Aryan face structure is neotenous (retaining the juvenile traits into adulthood) with blonde hair and blue eyes being "more neotenous" than the other white features. The face should be oval with soft features - no angularity like Kaiser Wilhelm and no massively sloping forehead like the typical Jewish neanderthal look; the flatter and higher the better. These traits are associated with higher finger digit ratio, which tends to equip the Aryan with lower natural testosterone levels. Ectomorphy is preferred over endomorphy and mesomorphy.
Now why would the Nazis prefer mostly traits associated with lower testosterone? If you look at East Asians, you will find they are more neotenous than Western Asians. The Nazis picked out criminal faces and excluded them from reproduction. The goal of the Nazis was to breed all whites to appear as similar and as beautiful as possible, with the men resembling the women as much as possible, as in certain primate species, low sexual dimorphism (not much difference between the genders) reduces male-male conflict.
The penis size had nothing to do with it. Whites live in Hitler's Hell.
