>>10758169Well, do you want me to let this one die then?
Aw, but I like Aqua's design. Moona's is a bit too straightforward, but you're probably seeing things which I don't.
>like gardening, or just the plants themselves?No, paleontology as in fossils and such. Not that I am too knowledgeable about the topic, but when I was little I liked reading a lot about dinosaurs, so this is more or less just a continuation of that. Did you know that a large portion of dinosaurs were closer to birds than to reptiles? They had feathers too, T-Rex included.
But yes, funnily enough I used to volunteer as a gardener in one of the university's gardens.
>I've read it's not exactly a traditional gameI don't mind it when games experiment. But depends on what you meant by traditional. Is it a point and click kind of thing? Something which is more of a puzzle than your standard VN?
Speaking of the lore, is there even more to it? I read something once about how the director was quite disappointed by the fact that most of the people who have watched the show and had taken the time to properly dissect it reached the same conclusions.
>of course, if we're just talking about Japanese animation, Miyazaki's stuff is hard to topYou're the expert. What exactly makes his stuff hard to top? They look amazing, for sure, but I can't exactly pinpoint why I think that. Well I can, but I don't know the proper words for it.
Pretty much every young manga reader liked at least one shonen. I liked Bleach when I was little because I thought that the art and the fights were cool. Early on at least.
I want to read this manga called Natsu no Zenjitsu. Some Anon from /lit/ said that it reminded him of a book called Snow Country. I don't know what to think of that, though. I doubt that manga can go toe to toe with (proper) literature.
