>>6029495So you mean the definition of human needs would in itself cause more issues than it would help? That it would put troubles into the previously unknowing mind? Ignorance is bliss? It seems to me, and I see it every day, even on this board: that the needs give themselves enough space without there being any knowledge or deeper definition of their meaning, that they are present and always hierarchical from the get-go. But maybe hierarchical is the wrong word here, I think they float in to each other, in the way that everything is connected, every single little detail and thing, not only in the human mind but in the entire universe. And the task at finding this out, this net, this web, becomes for me an impossible task. Especially in the presence of the passage of time, the journey, no time for collecting ones thoughts. i f e e l l i k e i m f a l l i n g ^=^
>>6029490I liek stories! ^o^
