>>12592824Total lie not confirmed anywhere.
What we DO know that has been confirmed through at least three layers of tradition/ laws, myth, archeology
>faggots and evildoers, which was the same thing for Nordics, were thrown into bogs, executed or could be killed by anyone (as all families had warriors outlawing somebody was basically the starting signal for a little manhunt).>jewsus hung out with gays and fathered no children>retarded and weak children could be killed by the patriarch which was frankly necessary in a harsh world>The church is soo based for forcing retards to live among us>Women and maybe slaves could probably accompany the men to the afterlife, which was done by killing them at the burial. This may have been a rare act in the wake of dead chieftains but we know that this solves a lot of problems and willing widows in India did this even recently. Again, I see no problem with a woman following her husband on her own free will.>No! Fill our nunneries with depressed, half-insane women, goy who will work full time for us without pay!>Major temples may have presented living offerings to the chief god every couple years. Presentations were potentially ghoulish affairs. Human sacrifices were probably defeated enemies or willing subjects. Again, if this is rare I see no problems. Everything the west does today is insane compared to a sacrifice every couple of years. The Sagas make it clear that you cannot change your fate by sacrificing more and more to the Gods who will curse you for such shameful behaviour.
>You cannot sacrifice, goy, but give us every ounce of your money, time and your son's life to aid in israel's wars!That's about it. No biggie.
As a homework, think about the many stories where a certain tribe literally sacrifices White children starting from antiquity (Moloch). The addition to Hansel & Gretel, the house made from sugarstuff is from modernity, where jews literally lured children with cheap sweets into their house.
