>>10427952Section 2: The Cosmological arguments
These arguments argue from basic metaphysical facts we can observe, such as "things are composed, things change, things can fail to exist.", which we substitute by X.
1. Some things in our experience are X.
2. That which is X requires a cause, especially for its existence as such in the here and now (a principle of causation).
3. Some such causal series must have a most fundamental member (a principle of termination of causal series).
4. That which terminates these causal series is not-X.
5. That which termiantes these causal series also possesses the divine attributes, such as:
- unity,
- immutability,
- immateriality,
- omnipotence,
- omnipresence,
- omniscience,
- agency,
- etc...
A classic example is the Aristotelian proof, who reasoned towards the so called unmoved mover (by which he means unchanged changer).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oty7xR9WmJ0 