>>13116410>why [is] our art is so threatening to the occupation regimeIn short, it is not as much of a threat as it is a catalyst to their hatred of ones self, others and in extension nature.
The whole point of "Aryan" art is to inspire the viewer to ask themselves the questions of how they live up to said art, as it rose up in the final stages of rationalism where every complex of ideas was trying to find a way to replace a dying god and self-perfection was the singular idea around which it was formed.
Aryan art often uses Classical Realism as its baseline due to its perfection of the natural form while also leaving its characters faceless or with abstract facial features which it uses as a mirror for its viewer. By leaving the idealized character's identity abstract the author can allow the viewer to envision themselves as said character or rather the art becomes the tool through which the viewer can project themselves into their own individual idealized form, hence why it is inspirational.
This is precisely the catalyst that unleashes all of their hatred.
In its unison with the natural they see their own inability to come to terms with their own natural limitations, due to their lack of humility. It leaves no room for pride.
In its simplicity it is accessible to the common man to both be an author and a viewer. Even though they hate realism, which requires skill to create and knowledge to fully appreciate its intricacies, it is hated less than Aryan art since they can not form closed circles and groups around it. It leaves no room for elitism.
In its nature of serving as a tool to the commoner its purpose is no longer about the author or the art itself, but rather the viewer. It is no longer egotistical.
In its ability to allow the viewer to project themselves into their individual version of the ideal it acts as a mirror to the souls desires. It becomes a monument to all their sins.
Its threat is not to their power but to their individual personalities.
