>>20837263people who have less are going to struggle more.
that is just how things are.
>it's not profitablemaybe it is but there are regulations that make it hard for private citizen to set up such institutions, or maybe it isn't profitable because the costs are too high, in which case the price of the universities (which you despise so much for being useless as you can learn their teachings alone) to certify your skills is justified.
>so they wouldn't have done ittop tier reading comprehension right there...
>answer my questionIm assuming you're referring to this:
"Why can't you accept giving up a fraction of your wealth for others to at least have a shot at a successful career and life? "
in which case my reply is that I'm not fundamentally against helping others. (as also highlighted in one of my previous posts, where I mention that helping others can even be profitable)
I just don't think that helping should be mandatory and compelled through the state's redistribution policies. because there's no difference from that and stealing.
there are hundreds of state policies, funded with tax money, that I fundamentally disagree with, yet one can't opt out of them.
there are people voting to give themselves gibs and this is disgusting. theft "legitimized" by the democratic process. (see recent AHV decision where 80% of people older than 65 voted yes (lmao))
