>>4799975because by responding "still doesn't look like a sphere" you implicitly admit that mars does not look like a swirly fairy up there in the heavens.
what i'm saying is that the p900 is an awful camera for astrophotography. you end of with shite tier photos that look nothing like what you actually see out of a telescope.
here's a picture of Saturn i took myself. now compare that to the p900 pics of Saturn you have stored in your flat earth library. see? that's called a direct counterexample. you claim that saturn looks nothing like what nasa claims it does (desu, not even just nasa, but EVERYBODY WITH A FUCKING TELESCOPE), and i provide a direct example proving you wrong.
