>>12677156yeah but your argument was that "i didnt take into account mining" and i did, you yourself actually wrote that I did. You yourself wrote 800m mined, about 800m used. So those 2 cancel each other out.
Then my math becomes fucking golden and you know it. Don't be butt hurt. Don't mope, just accept the fact that you don't have the cognitive ability to even construct a rational argument against the SETF movement.
