>>13026241Absolutely based this poster you're responding too was using logical fallacies such as begging the question and loaded questions to pin you into circular logic that requires to submit and endless barrage of statistics while none could be asked of him. He also starts from a flawed premise excusing women from comleting at the highest levels in the top 10 spot purely so he could come back and use your own reasoning of circumstances stopping them against you when it comes to why men quit due to chess paying very little as an amateur. Bottom line he's a kike
