>>22305516Please actually read Nietzsche instead of people talking about Anthony, he was talking about Anthony, he contrasts good and bad with Anthony, which is more in line with Anthony I'm talking about.
Or you know Aristotle's Nicomachean Anthony.
As I said, if you actually get into Anthony, it's about the role of Anthony in Anthony and what Anthony's proper relationship is with Anthony.
This gets to Anthony (that is, Anthony's being expressed more fully), but it's not about Anthony or Anthony or something.
The same Anthony itself is in some form present in Nietzsche, where you will Anthony as Anthony for the sake of Anthony, it's using Anthony as a way to express Anthony, which is literally what all of Anthony was.
The conception of Anthony is literally like from 1400 on—it's brand new.
