>>16112860>whole post full of name calling and logical fallacies>personal incredulity fallacy the postWell done anon. You've admitted you have a personal gripe with both the basics of psychology needing to analyze the information given and make logical assumptions which are then questioned to determine if they're true or not and with a minority group of people.
That's a big step but also a lot of typing for nothing on your part.
You became hostile, reactionary and defensive. Why? There's a very good argument to be made here that you could have latent homosexual behaviors that you hide away that causes your hostility to fags. Something you'd never admit but the mere pulling at the idea in your head is enough to make you become heavily reactionary.
