>>13040376>Do I believe in God? Heaven?If I have no faith, why the intense conviction and loyalty to these entities?
I take issue with the fact that the mutilation of this faith has given rise to the Canaanite-dominated Western Culture, which I condemn because clearly it is empirical folly. Teaching men to mutilate their dicks and take pills to become monsters is blatantly empirical folly.
I defend the faith, not because of the "divine majesty and unquestionable dominion of Yahweh", but because the moral principles outlined by Yahweh are justifiable in an empirical sense of morality.
Morality, in the empirical sense, is the science which "minimizes negative yield and maximizes positive yield from each member of the society, with respect to the total value, power, health, etc. of society". I defend this because it is correct, not because of some magic ghosts.
Why is morality correct? Why is civilization better than the death of civilization?Per empiricism, the human is an animal, thus it is sugar fire.
>>13032866The purpose of human existence within this reality is chemically identical to fire, thus we exist to reduce potential chemical energy within the universe. Natural order of the universe attempts to maximize the ability of each unit within it to exacerbate entropy. This is why life exists. We reduce sugar faster than our original parallel, fire. By being superior to fire at reducing the chemical potential energy of sugar, life then justifies its existence.
As the purpose of our existence is to reduce potential chemical energy, this means that civilization is aligned to our purpose, because this gives us the strength, cohesion, health, and longevity to reduce more potential chemical energy.
There is a profound amount of potential chemical energy in the universe, and for us to "reduce as much potential energy as is physically possible", requires that the species to spread throughout the universe as much as possible until the death of the universe.
