>>15643705And, I feel like what I'm going off is carried by some empathy. I think the system is against them, they're thrown away and not cared for, and it's torture. How they'll end up after a decade or two of being in their environment, is an equivalent of death in my eyes, just with more suffering. Both for them, and who they may cause it for, once they get back out.
>>15643719Oh. Yeah. I don't know, I got carried away by stuff and stood the whole night up. Which is nice, I think.
>>15643731I think so too, that if it's possible to change the conditions rather than resort to anything like I said, it should be done. I think myself that what I'm saying is really immoral, killing people still isn't right. But it comes off more as giving mercy to me. I feel like I see them as vegetables, because of what they will rot into through the fucked up prison system. I only suggest the killing because the lack of anything better, not cause I think it's good, but because the only other thing at hand is worse. Prison is simply suffering. And, it's just my incapability of coming up with a better idea. But, do you think a person who has spent a good chunk of their lifetime, will be able to fit in with those conditions once they get out? Even if those conditions are better, imagine a perfect city once they get out, do you think that person will not bring harm towards the people there? After what he's been molded into, thanks to the suffering he's went through because of whatever hellhole prison he was in.
I feel like the way of thinking should be, yes, you should prioritize making conditions better, but not for the people who won't fit into it. You should make the conditions better so people in the future won't have to cause harm. People who get out of prison being who they've been turned into, and keep continuing their influence, is a roadblock to that.
Thoughts?
