>>10289904i think there's been a bit of a decline in posting frequency and poster numbers recently. i'm thinking of ways to account for that atm. of course we must be careful because we don't want to do any ol' retarded thing and post a link to the general on /b/ or something and ask for anybody to waltz in. but getting a few new posters wouldn't be a bad idea. and maybe if everything returns to normal within the next few weeks i'll end up not doing anything about it anyway.
