>>11881161yes, it's a reflexive feeling
I wouldn't put it to emotion category
>appealingwait
I lost my train of thought
I condemn codependency... but I don't think I can start iff without it
yeah
I'd say it be something like that
>some canand those uaually end up cheating
or they get beat to submission by their husbands
>girls14 yos are shy and sway off of dirty topics like that, hence my purity obsession with them
>noc theoryno johm... I was talking r9k tier robots and normalfags as humen
>scriptedrhat's not entirely a bad thing, hive mind humen that din't think for themselves and only copy others are far biggef menace than sentient robots that follow the logical script
>whome, I have a fetish for rules
for every rule I break I take a penalty
something akin to stigmas for being a bad man
though I might be a libertarian in heart I am definitively authoritarian in actions
>smoothlythat applies to lies more than omissions
omissions creare holes, data you can't backtrack or check, they are suspicious but even with context a conspiracy can't be pulled from them
lies are fickle thing, you add mounds of false data that demands lots and lots of patchwork, it mostly never works out, especially if you can't ask somebody to shut their bloody mouth , it stsrts leaking the moment they take to context, it doesn't fit
with omissions you can go on and say it straight that you can't tell them... good luck explaining why you lied to them
>young and flatthey take after peak female body forme
