>>18283882which is exactly why i say, that one sex MUST suffer the other. one must be a slave, if you want to have families, and kids (aka happiness), one must be under control of the other. one will not simply give in for no reason
>>18283885oh, i thought you meant small scale stuff. large scale it doesnt happen, because its impossible to organize. noone agrees on anything in the first place, and again, police and govt have more abilities to spy on large groups of people than ever before. you will be crushed by govt before you get anywhere at all. and now that liberal govt is basically a reflection of what women want, as men naturally put them on a pedestal... well, good luck. it wont happen until a pretty vast majority of men are all randomly finally on the same page naturally. im really not sure that would ever happen.
what could make it happen though is things going to shit in several other sectors. for example, the fed is finally starting to keel over from its failed policies (and arguably ofc, its entire structure is a fraud - thats the page im on). this gives the ability for men to fight for some kind of banner that other changes may take place in due to simply proximity. something like this is probably the only way it would happen
