>>13856035you don't seriously think the existence of Jesus, the man, is to be called into question do you?
take the time to look at contemporary non-Christian sources: Tacitus writes about him, Pagan Stoics write about him, Jews write about him—none of whom are favourable nor sympathetic to Christianity itself
the question is not that the man—the dissident —existed; this is a documented fact; it's whether or not there's proof that something really quite odd actually happened 2000 years ago, as Christians would have you believe
