>>20766296I was thinking something similar. There's no way that AI service shown in the article is more popular than Character AI. The article seems like a bad ad. It's also crazy that the site mentioned in the article posts the AI woman's 'age' as if they have something to gain by doing that.
>29>33>55Why? If you can have anyone/anything, why a caricature of some worn-out, used-up whore?