>>13320089>how it disproves 9/11 is relevantnot sure i understand, she's not saying 9/11 is irrelevant? you can't help people who won't help themselves. i tried to answer you with a simple question, which if you thought about should have brought you to the answer to your original question. do the cars somehow disprove the 9./11 story? the answer, of course, is yes. does a building collapse cause what has been posted to cars? does a building collapse do this? does "jet fuel"? if the answer is no, what does that tell you? prove what is, by proving what isn't
