>>5226658I honestly don’t know how to reply to that. Q mentioned all of those people (except the bogs I think) and you’re not happy with it because he didn’t refer to them by their “group’s” name?
When I said “drop info about the deep state” I kind of meant something that wasn’t Q related (since you guys all think it’s fake...)
I’m a man of my word, I’ll leave when you drop Intel on the Deep State that has no relation to Q.
I asked you to do this for two reasons:
1. Shills WILL not discuss true info about the Deep State (I.E. Israel funded and continues to fund Isis)
2. Because most intel we’ve gotten since Trump has taken office has ALL been predicted by Q. So if you were to find something that hadn’t been previously predicted I would be genuinely surprised.