>>3127273>The concept of the permanent revolution is quite similar to the constant war Oceania fights in 1984.Permanent Revolution is not a violent struggle against oppression, it is both the realization that governance must undergo constant change and improvement, and the mechanism by which governments are not statically held.
>The democratic and libertarian socialism, not initiated by an angry mob but by the educated middle class in favor of not only the proletariat but everybody, and established through gradual reforms towards a socialism is the only way this can even work. Libertarian socialism is neither Libertarian nor socialism. To be truthful, it isn't even democratic in any meaningful sense.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_socialismLibertarian socialism is essentially a form of tribal capitalism, and is positively worthless.
>The bourgeosie would still be really pissed about socialist reforms, but that's far better than killing them. The decreasing bourgeoisie must accept socialist reforms, if they are to represent the will of the public, and thereby maintain themselves as the bourgeois.
>Only democracy and federalism can give a socialism the stability it requires.That is the exact opposite of correct. Stable socialism requires global governance, full stop. Federalism is absolutely antithetical to sustainable market socialism. Socialist governance must be large, and all-encompassing. It is the division of people (Federalism, for example) which destabilizes socialist ideals and advantages.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permanent_revolution#.27Permanent_revolution.27_according_to_Trotskyhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uneven_and_combined_development 