>>810859poor quality b8 m8
> Prior to widespread smoking lung cancer was incredibly rarePrior to widespread smoking computers were incredibly rare.
So computers cause lung cancer?
Whats your point anon?
Correlation vs Causation. its fallacy #1.
> where people don't smoke, they don't get lung cancersrc pls.
> this isn't the 1950s anymoreis this the new version of "current year"...?
> Fewer are starting NOW, the ones that are dying are the ones that started 40 years ago, your shilling is of poor quality.Correct assumption, incorrect conclusion:
> picFor the last 50 years women and men pretty much smoke the same amount over the whole period.
However:
Rate of women to men getting lung cancer has gone from 1/5 women to men, to 1/2 women to men...
Why would the rate of lung cancer be so sexist 50 years ago, but getting less so now??
HMMMMM.... really gets the almonds roasting...