>>17673702WTF, I checked and it isn't photoshop.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/multimedia/image/9_222014_ap766529536121-18201jpg/But in pic-rel he looks normal. What gives?
>>17673703It is.
>>17673704I mean, I liked when /pol/ had more hardcore conspiracy theories than just criticizing globohomo social issues, a more /x/ theme is preferable.