>>11105061oho, how so, you got ohotographic mem brit? neat
>coping mechanismI'm not so sure, for something like that I'd need a meta analysis or atleast a cohort study to make a decision, too bad all therapists are scam
and I'd like to just add onto yours that alongside actions what matters is how organised are they, as acting on a whim is significantly different from acting according to keikaku
>can't compareyou can't compare sugar to those either but people love it, they yearn from it, hell back in the day it was actually good for people as having a sweet tooth may have meant life or death, but nowadays the people are letting it destroy their life and panxreas and teeth
what I'm trying to say is we shouldn't be too keen on getting rid of things we know nothing about consequences upon it's removal, gradual weaning off is okay I guess, but we don't know what total ban on porn would lead to just because we can agree that oversaturation of porn leads to depravity and putrid behaviour
it would be better if people didn't ybuse drigs, but it would be definitively worse if people didn't have any drugs at all, an outlet must exists unless we want the damn to burst with catastrophic consequences
just because we can't see doesn't mean the fisiological role does not exist, we mut never rush unless we have intel and info which validates the rush ( and like theres an active race and all, which as it seems there isn't but I'm not the one to call the shots anyway)
