>>16552237We can prove that Q is deliberately misleading through basic logic.
Q claims to be raising awareness of classified intelligence operations targeting various evil organizations. Periodically he and his shills crow about some synchronicity between a newsworthy event and a Q post as proof that Q is real.
However... the organizations Q is targeting, if they are real, can read the chans the same as you or I can. The difference is that, where *WE* have to go off currently public information, the pedo networks also have all their internal information available. They can decode a Q vaguepost faster than anons can.
If Q leaked anything that gave advance notice of, say, an impending arrest - that gives the targeted cabal member time to kill the kids and book a private flight out of the country. If the cabal is real, then Q is intentionally feeding them information.
If Q is actually *against* the cabal, then the information he feeds them will be misleading. He will post shit that, when decoded, gives the impression that the FBI is barking up the wrong tree and the cabal can relax.
If, on the other hand, Q is working FOR the cabal - then he will try to post stuff that warns cabal members of impending ops WITHOUT enabling normies to identify the cabal members. The NETWORK will be real... but any realworld group that an anon can identify as the person/group Q is calling out is going to be someone who (as far as Q knows) is not part of the cabal.
There is no plausible situation in which Q posts aren't disinfo.
