>>22399314>>22399315>>22399316I've said this a billion times, it's called Fisherian Runaway Selection:
>females prefer a certain trait for breeding>they are not programmed with moderation or any sort of limit>the stronger the trait, the more they want to breed with that male>selection leads to that trait being magnified to the extreme>to the point where it becomes dysgenic and the males are actually less fit for survival due to it In human society it's:
>women are given the right to choose who they breed with>they breed with whatever man looks the best, is most violent, is tallest>people who actually contribute to society are slowly selected out since women would pick the repeat-offender felon with a strong jawline over the engineer who maintains the power station>women would prefer to be part of the former's 50-strong harem than in a monogamous relation with the latter>the aforementioned contributing people are no longer rewarded with procreation and so they check out>new generations do not have the genetic capital to maintain complex systems>eventually society collapsesWomen, if given the choice, will revert civilization to a violent tribal society where the top 5% of men have harems and the remaining 95% fight over the scraps. Violent revolutions and infighting would be extremely common as the have-nots kill the alphas for their women in a constant cycle.
Needless to say, civilization cannot form like this. Women DO NOT select for or want civilization. Can you think of a single civilization in history where procreation was mainly decided by women? No, you can't, because such societies do not last long enough to be written about in the history books.
