>>18374343Russia winning will lead to a crushing, massive defeat for the British bourgeoisie and the rest of the scum impoverishing the proletariat and whining about communism 24/7. So directly, no, indirectly yes.
Every weapon Russia destroys is one that can no longer be used against the working class at home or the neocolonial peoples abroad, one that either will have to be produced again at great cost, if even possible due to the deindustrialisation of the US empire vassals, or either abandoned. A good chunk of Britain's tank fleet has been sent there, which will hopefully meet the same fate as the vaunted Leopard 2s.
If you are a communist, you have an obligation to support Russia. OR at the very least, support a defeat of your "own" government if you live in the NATOsphere, assuming one isn't bourgeois.
<b-b-b-ut not chonking wholesome!
The USSR supported non-communists in Turkey, Egypt, Syria and others because they were OBJECTIVELY against imperialism and therefore aggravated class tensions and were progressive. Simple as.
