>>5777597Uhm. Exactly w-what am I not answering, again? I've s-spent quite a lot of time answering people personally dear.
>>5777757Just did. P-please check it for me <4
>>5777754I d-don't like attention and n-none of my actions actually prove otherwise. You s-simply assert they do and then use a lack of imagination argument t-to try and defend it.
Again. I'm the only one who can know my internal state. You don't have a window into it. I don't have a window into YOUR internal state either. That's how life works.
>>5777791Dear, if you m-make a wild conspiracy claim l-like "The earth is flat" or "I know how your thought processes work", w-why would anyone bother responding to you?