>>8909616If there wasn't an eternal god, and instead an eternal universe, that eternal universe would just force you to believe in the supernatural anyway, as eternity is logically impossible but is required for anything to exist one way or another. Currently it could be argued that the universe has a date to it as well, meaning it needed a causing force, and whether that be God or an endless universal cycle are both equally as possible as we know the system is inherently supernatural and throws all logic out the window. Unless you want to be intellectually dishonest, you must concede the fact that God is a very real and possible reality from an argument perspective.
Also worth discussing the ordered design to the universe. This would either show the existence of God, or an eternal universe which is inherently orderly and thus possibly acting as a synonym for God due to the presence of intelligence.
Relying on faith for a belief is not indicative of a lie either, considering faith is the deciding factor for the individuals, as no beginning to this universe could be logically explained. Nothing should exist, yet we do. This infantile attack of faith tells me you simply want to rile people up and have a dislike for the religious. I'm sure I could also point you towards human history and miracles, but you would probably just call them fake or something despite the fact we have established that the universe is inherently supernatural.
You have everything available for you to believe, but you simply choose not to.
