Quoted By:
what would constitute scientific proof of the Apollo missions?
>independent
a body that is independent from NASA and not reliant on funds
>verifiable
it can travel to the moon to take high resolution photos of the actually Apollo artifacts below 100m and this information is released into the public domain.
>repeatable
future independent missions can go to the Apollo sites and confirm their veracity
All of this was achieved by China who apparently did this with Chang'e 2 but NEVER released the footage, ergo, Apollo has still NEVER been proven scientifically.
Now unfortunately Apollo is unfalsifiable, since there is a 'no flyzone' over ALL APOLLO sites and a 2.5 mile proximity ban on the ground.
This means Apollo can NEVER be proven scientifically.
