>>22146305talking about claire is part of life advancing, it's probably too complicated for a simpleton for you to accept
there is a critical difference between the modes in which people engage with people online... you are under the delusion it actually matters, you care about fake internet respect from people you'll never meet and are probably bots. Even your insults like accusing people of dysgenic, this betrays you think "what someone says online" should carry some real weight in the real life.
the internet isn't real, our engagement with it out to be aesthetic rather than anything like engaging with a real human. nu-mde people don't really get this but it's the default mode of people who have been around...
As an example with the claire posting, yes I'm an avid claire poster. But is it because I'm obsessed with claire as a person? No that's an absurdity, I don't know Claire, you can't know someone by watching videos and looking at pictures. All we have as a loose disconnected image uniting this set of content. The way you appreciate that content is not by seeing it dispassionately, but by becoming a "fanatic". If letty is making content I'll "letty post" if claire is I'll cliare post or if it's scott I'll scott post. It's just like identifying with a sports team to appreciate it more.
And it's not merely shallow, by dynamically sort of radically committing to these rather loose aesthetics we can understand different sorts of people and their situations more. It comes from a sort of recognition of the loose and disconnected nature of it, the only proper way to engage with it is the 100% committed larp, because that's the only way you can get to anything real. By overheating it and engaging with it as-disconnected it reconnects to real life and you can understand people in the abstract then integrate that with your real life.
If you want to understand this better read the Illiad and heidegger's work like the Parmenides
