>>19198421>The problem is profitability, your entire market depends on advertisement.then the problem is the 'market'[internet advertising] his trash itself. there shouldnt be billions of dollars up for grabs for retards to spam people. it shouldnt even be a thing. it should be socially unacceptable and legally banned.
>>19198421>Are you saying Google should run YouTube as a charity? I mean I fucking hate Alphabet and Google and YouTube a lot and even I don't think thats really a realistic position to have.yes. yes it should. considering google was funded by the government and is still heavily subsidized directly and indirectly by the government and is basically a arm of the national intelligence community, and that alphabet is an extremely bloated and overvalued company that has become a clear hostile entity to the public. in a just world they would be shut down and the management all arrested and crushed to death, but i would settle for them not trying to jew us on top of all the jewery they've done to us.
they should be forced to reimburse ALL OF US for all the income they made off our personal data that they harvested and sold a thousand times over. they have stolen our life's private data from the people before people even understood the longterm implications of agreeing to google's invasive terms of service. i signed up for gmail when i was underage and agreed to their terms and have data on me cataloging my whole life.
the income they make off our data is more than enough to provide us with these basic services without asking for more money under threats of psychological assault(spam advertisements)
honestly everyone who works at google should be crushed to death. and at all big tech. NGL.
