>>14417231>The evidence is Scriptural.Scriptural evidence can only prove that such a scripture exists. It cannot prove the truth or the accuracy of it with respect to another independent concept.
No,, that is not evidence, and no you di not answer my question in the first place. Had you, I would not have insisted that you answer it. (that should go without saying but you live in a rubric of dishonesty and delusion instead of pure truth.)
>you need to provide a proper justification for why the Bible is not evidential in this context.Presenting a copy of text in a book is evidence only that the book contains the text, nothing more.
>This is all contingent upon your meaning of “evidence”, which is why I asked for a justified definition.Holy fuck, man, the fdirst fuicking defionition at the top of google for the fucking search "definition of evidence" - it aint' fucking hard, i'm not reaching back into the forgotten legends of obsolete vernaculars here, EVIDENCE you fucking dolt.
Evidence that this is true:
>>14417120(not evidence the bible SAYS it's true, but evidence that it IS true)
Pic related so can stop being dense now.
