>>9397620I get that you tried to answer my question, but find your answer painfully inadequate.
Actually, no, Ill give points on Jung, his work on archetypes and psych abstractions has some value in why humans paint a pretend face on clouds in interpreting reality, its like being willing to make a type 2 error (theres a lion behind that bush = f) vs a type 1 error (theres nothing I can think of that makes me want to fear that noise in the bushes).
Humans do have imagination.
You insult me a little by implying I lack an open mind when I'm trying to cut through the bullshit here.
It looks like playing pretend. Don't act like thats somehow MY fault here.
Protip: anything that calls itself truth with a capital T is untrustworthy by default.
I asked for a mechanism, none has been demonstrated. I appreciate the effort, but I'ma give a C- , not what the question requested.
