Quoted By:
Posting about the failures of British military gear on /k/ is even more censored than posting about American gear + the bongs fervently defend their gear. They see themselves as the number 1 threat to the Russian military. It makes for a great time. Here’s a short list of proven insecurities to post about
>the warrior ifv
This is the big one. It has an unstabilized main gun so it can’t shoot on the move. It feeds from a 3 round clip instead of a belt. It’s had a poor service record. No export sales
>challenger 2 tank
Underpowered engine, rifled barrel when everyone else has smoothbore. Poor armor. Asbestos in the armor. No export sales
>sa-80 / L85
British service record. Known to be extremely unreliable. Widely seen as the worst service rifle in use anywhere on earth
>queen Elizabeth class aircraft carriers
Non nuclear powered. No catapults or arresting wires to launch fixed wing aircraft. The QE class doesn’t have the ability to launch and recover AEW which are critical assets to have
